From: James
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 8:35 AM
To: WALSH, BOBBYGUNTHER
Subject: Mayor Ed
So Mayor Ed is going to Israel. Great - now he can be an international embarrassment
Jim
Allentown
From: Pat
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 8:47 AM
To: WALSH, BOBBYGUNTHER
Subject: pensions
Hi Bobby,
I just glanced at the paper this morning and noticed an article about a surplus in Harrisburg. Politicians are scrambling to spend it, putting stuff back into the budget. Why don't they use this surplus to help fund the bloated pension system, rather than raise our taxes? Just wondering.
Pat
Fogelsville
From: MaryAnn
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 4:34 PM
To: WALSH, BOBBYGUNTHER
Subject: Fast & Furious vs. Columbia
Gunther -
Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., has said that the DOJ has spent more time and resources trying to protect the careers of its officials who knew about the operation (Fast and Furious) than in holding accountable those who were involved. In fact, the evidence shows that the only ones who have been punished are those who blew the whistle on the operation, while those who were engaged in wrongdoing have been rewarded – reassigned or promoted with their pensions still intact.
Compare this to our recent Columbia debacle where heads did roll. How ironic!
Mary Ann
Center Valley
From: Jeffrey
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 8:31 AM
To: WALSH, BOBBYGUNTHER
Subject: Obama's immigration plan
Bobby,
Just saw an article from the Washington Post (via the Drudge website), “For first time since Depression, more Mexicans leave U.S. than enter”. When I saw this story this morning it dawned on me that Obama really does have an immigration program. He really is a genius, by making our economy worse than Mexico’s, he solves the illegal immigration problem and makes it look like it’s the illegal’s choice not come here anymore.
Enjoy as always,
Jeff
From: Alfred
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 7:11 PM
To: WALSH, BOBBYGUNTHER
Subject: Letter to the editor, the meaning of words
Words have power. Not only do words have direct meaning, but they also convey concepts, which can be misleading or completely wrong.
A case in point is the word “free”, as in “free stuff”. The word implies a transaction that does not involve a financial exchange by anyone in the product or services supply chain. So, when an obviously not-poverty-stricken young woman asks for free contraceptives, she apparently is asking everyone involved in supplying this product, from the supplier of the raw material, the manufacturer, shipper, handler, retail outlet, and probably others, not to receive payment for their goods or services. No one, not even the young woman in question, would agree to such an arrangement. Obviously, she meant that people other than herself should pay for her “stuff”.
This misunderstanding can easily be corrected.
Free for her is not free to the rest of us who would be paying for her contraceptives. Therefore, I suggest that the lexicon be changed, substituting the words “paid by others” whenever the word “free” is used when referring to “stuff”. If someone on radio or television uses the word “free”, there should be an immediate correction stating “You mean paid by others.” Newspapers merely have to add (paid by others; ed) after the word “free” to clarify.
Think of the effect this would have on our present culture. When some protestor grabs a bullhorn and shouts “I demand my (choose: medical insurance, college tuition, abortion, gym membership, I-pod, etc) be paid by others”, the net effect would be not nearly as inflammatory as the word “free”, but would be astronomically more accurate. Given time, the entire concept of “free stuff” would change.
I’m sure that some will consider it presumptuous for a mere engineer to play antics with semantics, but word usage should be precise both in denotation and connotation.
Thanks.
Alfred
From: William
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 8:57 AM
Subject: Romney's Wealth.
It just occurred to me... With all the noise the media is making about Romney's wealth, I don't recall such bluster and hand-wringing over the Kennedy fortune. Or, for that matter, John Kerry. Or the fact that John Kerry gave virtually nothing to charity while Romney gave something on the order of $4 million ... in addition to his entire inheritance from his father. Oh. Wait. I just remembered. Romney is Republican. Kerry and the Kennedys are Democrats. Also, Romney worked for his money. Kennedy inherited his. And Kerry married it.
Never mind. Nothing to see here folks. Moving along.
William
From: dave
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 6:54 AM
To: WALSH, BOBBYGUNTHER
Subject: Luxury?? Who's out of touch?
Bobby,
Obama says the Republicans are out of touch? His family did not have the “luxury” of having a stay-at-home mom? It is not a luxury to stay at home with your children, it is a choice. I respect either choice a mother and father make for their specific situation. Some women prefer to join the workforce and that is ok if that is their choice. But I will tell you from personal experience that the choice my wife and I made for my wife to stay home with our three children was not a luxury. We made the conscience decision to cut our family income in half when she stopped working. I don’t care if it is $40,000 or $140,000, you notice when your family income gets cut in half. It is a choice you make to adjust your lifestyle. After 18 years, we have never regretted our choice.
Sincerely,
Dave
From: Jim
To: jimmy
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 3:35 PM
Subject: Letter to the Editor
Senate Democrats recently unveiled legislation that would ensure that all millionaires would pay a federal tax of at least 30 percent. They call it the "Buffet Bill," referring to the billionaire, Warren Buffet. He's the guy that said his secretary pays a higher rate of taxes than he does.
Well, he's also the guy that is the CEO of the eight-largest public company in the world, Berkshire-Hathaway. And this pro-tax tycoon's company has owed up to a Billion, yes, with a B in tax dollars since 2002. This is a company that has total assets of somewhre around 380 Billion dollars. Yet they can't come up with the One Billion that is owed in back taxes.
The "Buffet Bill?" I can't make this stuff up. Talk about hypocrisy. Or absolute mind-numbing stupidity. And as usual, coming from Washington. Go figure.
Jim
Allentown
From: mark
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 8:50 AM
To: WALSH, BOBBYGUNTHER
Subject: SCOTUS,POTUS,DOJ.DOMA?
Gunther,
Is it consistent to say the Supremes shouldn't overturn a Law, and the DOJ shouldn't defend DOMA in court? I don't think so.
Mark M.
From: Cindy
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 7:46 AM
To: WALSH, BOBBYGUNTHER
Subject: American citizens should have a right to their vote
Gunther,
Every time a dead person, a non-citizen, or a repeat voter votes they take away the votes of actual American citizens. It's theft. It's cheating.
Our vote is the only tool we have to put in office elected officials, who can represent us and protect our rights and freedoms.
Those, who are against ID's to vote, are actually saying that they are fine with votes of American citizens being nullified.
For those who wonder why our elected officials don't seem to represent us, they should ask themselves- who is voting?
How about we stop discriminating against American citizens?
Cindy
PS High school students will now need to show an ID in order to take the SATs…. so there will be no cheating.
From: Cindy
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 7:08 AM
To: WALSH, BOBBYGUNTHER
Subject: Senator Casey - An Enabler
Gunther,
The election in November will allow us to see if Pennsylvanians really understand why and how this country has radically transformed. The election that will give us the answer is not the re-election of Obama but the re-election of Senator Casey.
As I see it, Barack Obama could not have achieved all that he has achieved on his own. He could not have wasted taxpayer money on the stimulus & omnibus bills, taken over a car company, socialized healthcare, and more…without many elected officials surrounding him who enabled him - sometimes with their votes, sometimes by their silence.
Senator Casey is one of the enablers of Obama's agenda.
So, even if PA doesn't re-elect Obama but does re-elect Casey, then it will be clear to me that we still haven't learned that the problems we face are bigger than one man. We won't be able to correct our problems if all the enablers are still in office.
So, watch the election for PA Senate and you will see what the future holds for this country. If we don't get it by now, we never will.
Cindy
From: Paul
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 6:28 AM
To: WALSH, BOBBYGUNTHER
Subject: Does Obama's remarks mean that he will FIRE his UNELECTED CZARS ?
Gunther,
Does Obama’s condemnation of UNELECTED PEOPLE on the U.S. Supreme Court at his press conference yesterday mean that he will be firing his 30+ UNELECTED CZARS currently perverting and destroying our Free Enterprise system?
NOTE to Obama – In case your Constitutional Law training did not include it, the Supreme Court was APPROVED BY that same sacred Congress that created the totally partisan ObamaCare legislation. The ObamaCare legislation received NOT ONE Republican vote in the U.S. House of Representative nor in the U. S. Senate.
Paul
Bethlehem, PA
From: Jeffrey
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 4:16 PM
To: WALSH, BOBBYGUNTHER
Subject: Obama's comment on Supreme Court and Obamacare
Bobby,
Just heard Obama’s sound bite on the news in which he states it would be “unprecedented” for the Supreme Court to strike down a law that was “overwhelmingly” passed by Congress.
Obviously Obama must have missed the day in school when they taught:
1.) The difference between the definitions of the words popular and constitutional.
2.) The definition of unprecedented, since the Supreme Court declares laws unconstitutional on a regular basis.
Enjoy as always,
Jeff
From: Ben
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 8:09 AM
To: WALSH, BOBBYGUNTHER
Subject: I. D. for fishing
Good morning Bobby, I decided to get a new PA fishing license after giving up the sport for a few years. First I have to give my social security number because our U.S. congress pasted a law to try to catch our delinquent persons for child support. I then have to show proof of PA residence with one of the following,
valid PA driver’s license
a valid non-driver photo identification card
a previous year’s PA state income tax return showing proof of payment of personal income tax as a resident of PA
a previous year’s local earned income tax return showing tax paid to a PA municipality
a current PA voter registration card.
The Dems have a problem with voter I.D., give me a break !!
Take care, Ben from Germansville.
From: FREDERICK
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 8:31 PM
To: WALSH, BOBBYGUNTHER
Subject: Great News - significant Endorsement For President Obama
Gunther -
I just heard that Pravda - the official news organ for Russia - has endorsed President Obama in the upcoming presidential election!
WOW!
I guess they think he'll be giving Russia some significant concessions after he is reelected.
Fred
Schnecksville
From: Mark
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 12:01 PM
To: WALSH, BOBBYGUNTHER
Subject: Fwd: FW: Capitalism Akbar
After reading the headlines today about the US soldier who shot up Afghanistan civilians, I couldn’t help noticing an irony. There is all this clamor to try this guy quickly and execute him, never mind his having suffered a traumatic brain injury. Yet this Major Hasan, who shot up Fort Hood while screaming Allah akbar, still hasn’t stood trial, and they are still debating whether he was insane, even with the clear evidence regarding his motive: slay as many infidels as possible. So we have a guy in a war zone who cracks, and he must be executed immediately. But this Muslim psychiatrist who was stateside in a nice safe office all day murders 13, wounds 29 of our own guys, and they try to argue the poor lad suffered post-traumatic stress syndrome, from listening to real soldiers who had actual battle experience. Two and a half years later, they still haven’t tried the murderous bastard.
From: Cindy
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 9:55 AM
To: WALSH, BOBBYGUNTHER
Subject: Why isn't Oprah trying the socialist economic model?
Gunther,
Oprah just fired 30 people and cancelled Rosie O'Donnell's show. I don't understand this.
Rosie's show didn't get enough viewers and Oprah's new cable company isn't having enough success.
Isn't she the person who personally campaigned and helped foist Obama on America?
Why isn't she following his economic model? Why isn't she paying all these people for three years even without a job at her company?
Why isn't she paying their healthcare and birth control for the rest of their lives? Doesn't she care about women?
Why isn't she personally subsidizing a failed economic structure in her own company with her own wealth that she personally redistributes to these employees?
Maybe she should even mandate that her own employees watch her shows and then, she can fine them if they don't follow her mandate….
Or is it that Oprah is really a closet capitalist who is thinks capitalism is fine for her... just not for us?
Cindy
From: scott
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 6:06 AM
To: WALSH, BOBBYGUNTHER
Subject: voter ID
Gunther,
In France you have to have a special I.D. card to vote, a card electoral. You have to apply for the card with real I.D. What a bunch of right wing haters.
Scott
From: Dale
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 8:07 AM
To: WALSH, BOBBYGUNTHER
Subject: my solution
HBO's Bill Maher gets a pass for all the vile things he has said about conservative women. Now HBO's new movie "Game Change" predictably trashes Sarah Palin. My solution? I cancelled my subscription to HBO. Maybe all conservatives should do the same. Otherwise you're helping to finance more shows like this.
Dale
Salisbury Township
From: Mike
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 8:22 AM
To: WALSH, BOBBYGUNTHER
Subject: Casey given green light marching orders to vote his way
Knowing that the Dems had their vote in the bag, it would not surprise me in the least that they told Casey that he could vote against them to preserve the illusion of following in his Daddy's moral footsteps and keep a false leach alive for the next election in PA. Casey is about as close to a zero as I have seen in the senate. But it is better than some of those who rate negatives like Harry Reid.
It's BETLUM for you non dutchies.
Mike
Bethlehem
From: Joe
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 5:58 AM
To: WALSH, BOBBYGUNTHER
Subject: The Real Problem
Gunther,
The real problem we all have to acknowledge is very simple. Yes, we do not want progressive Big Government Socialist Democrats to win elections. However, as long as we accept and vote for progressive Big Government Republicans, we will never get out of this cycle of political insanity. When every single progressive Big Government Republican begins to lose elections, things will change by creating a party that is truly for less government. Every time we accept the lesser of two evils, we accept Bigger Government and we cannot complain.
Joe
From: Paul
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 10:51 AM
To: WALSH, BOBBYGUNTHER
Cc: Glenn Beck; Rush Limbaugh
Subject: Rush owes an apology to conservative listeners, not Fluke.
To Bobby Gunther Walsh
Gunther,
The Oxford English Dictionary defines “slut” as, “To behave like a slovenly woman or a woman of loose morals.”
Since words have an exact meaning, Rush used the word “slut” per the exact meaning. However, his use of that word took the focus off of the truly heinous, altruist principle in Fluke’s completely “staged” testimony only to radical left Democrats in Congress.
That heinous principle and economic outrage is that a woman, any woman, could arrogantly demand that her medical services be paid for by other people, that is, the taxpayers.
I agree that Rush should apologize, but not to Sandra Fluke. He should be apologizing to his conservative listeners for using a word accurately that took the focus off of the heinous principle of redistribution of wealth that was the core of Fluke’s testimony.
Paul
Bethlehem, PA
From: Cindy
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 7:07 AM
To: WALSH, BOBBYGUNTHER
Subject: How Ironic!
Gunther,
The Morning Call has a 2/27 article by Steve Esack titled "Bethlehem schools to examine assessments-School board hires firm to determine if large property owners are paying fair share of taxes."
The school board voted to sign a five year contract with Keystone Realty Advisors of Haddonfield, N.J.
"According to the contract, the firm will be paid 30 percent of the taxes collected in each of the first three years for each successful appeal, plus a maximum of $5,000 in expenses."
How ironic! The county is supposed to do its job-collecting all the taxes that the school board wants to spend and they can't even do that.
So, they have to hire a private company to do the job that the government fails to do and then they have to pay the private firm 30% commission.
I would laugh if it wasn't so pathetic.
Cindy
From: Robert
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 5:18 PM
To: WALSH, BOBBYGUNTHER
Subject: Caught in untruth!
Gunther: I was watching Wolf Blitzer interview Gingrich about a statement that he had made that the national media never questioned Obama about his stands on partial birth abortion. Wolf said that wasn't so and pulled out an interview that CNN had shown where a reporter did interview the President about the subject. Only one huge problem. The reporter was from CBN the Christian Broadcast Network, the reporter David Brody. Hardly a National media representative. They must think that we're stupid.
Bob
From: larry
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 12:19 AM
To: WALSH, BOBBYGUNTHER
Subject: Ode From Obama
Gunther:
Ain't no TAX high enough,
Ain't no REBATE low enough,
Ain't no REGULATION wide enough,
To keep me from gettin' to you.
Thank God for Separation of Powers.
Larry, Bethlehem.
From: Mike
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 6:49 AM
To: WALSH, BOBBYGUNTHER
Subject: Man hibernating in car
Gunther –
I heard you and Dan talking about the guy who was buried in his car under the snow. Apparently he was able to survive by going into a form of hibernation.
You specifically mentioned that they guy’s brain shut down and it was like he was in a coma.
Given that info, I’m assuming they also found an Obama/Biden bumper sticker on the car.
Mike
From: Cindy
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 11:52 AM
To: WALSH, BOBBYGUNTHER
Subject: School property tax reform
Gunther,
I heard your guest today. All of these problems were expected and laid out by Charlotte Iserbyt in her book the "Deliberate Dumbing Down of America."
Bankrupt locally and the school districts will beg the states for help. When education bankrupts the states, the states will beg the Federal government to take over.
Marxism is all about centralized control of indoctrination & workforce training centers, formerly known as schools.
The answer to education is two fold - end public sector unions and privatize.
Cindy
From: Paul
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 6:27 AM
To: WALSH, BOBBYGUNTHER
Subject: Only Former Democrat Presidents Allowed
Hi Bobby,
The message below was sent via email to the RNC.... again something else that IRKS me.
Paul
Zionsville, Pa
At what point in time are you GOP idiots going to WAKE UP and realize that Democratic Presidents once they leave the office NEVER FOLLOW "THE PROTOCOL" OF NOT SPEAKING ABOUT THE ISSUES WHEN THERE GONE Ever since President Reagan left office NOT ONE FREAKIN republican President has ever spoke up or defended themselves or addressed controversial or vitally important matters of the day. Yet almost DAILY we get a barrage of crap and CRITICISM and their input from the likes of Carter, Clinton and when and IF Obama is out of office we will get a continuation of his crap and I guarantee you he will ridicule the republican in the Oval Office on everything ??? WAKE THE HELL UP YOU IDIOTS AND MAKE THAT AN ISSUE AT SOME POINT IN TIME. Once again...NO GUTS you are all a bunch of ush overs !
From: James
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 11:25 PM
To: WALSH, BOBBYGUNTHER
Subject: rights to tax money
Gunther:
I always enjoy the moment when you and John Brinson go at it.
Today, John muddied the relationship between rights and tax money.
A right of behavior is not a right to tax money. Specifically,
a person has a right to (pursue happiness?) obtain birth control
devices. That person does not have the right to have the
government pay for it or for the government to force someone else,
eg. an insurance company, to pay for it. There is nothing in the
Constitution that even suggests that the federal government can
pay for birth control devices (or countless other things).
It's little more than a play on the old political theme,
I want it as long as someone else pays for it.
The opening paragraph of the Constitution states
'promote the general welfare'. Liberals hang their hat on this
statement as a basis for most (all?) entitlements.
Following the liberal line of thinking, a person may apply
for welfare benefits. Insurance companies financed by my
and your premium dollars have no welfare payment obligations.
Confused? The Second Amendment says we have a right to own guns.
Does the government hand out free guns to anyone who wants them?
Thanks, Jim
Delaware, NJ
From: Robert
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 4:32 PM
To: WALSH, BOBBYGUNTHER
Subject: Oil!!!
Gunther: I have never in my life seen such political ineptness as the Republicans are showing. There is issue after issue that just slides by them without any kind of a response.
Obama constantly talks about his compassion for the poor and elderly and yet who bears the greatest burden of high gas and heating oil prices, the poor and elderly,.and yet the Republicans will be content to blame Iran instead getting to the source of the problem and that is the President himself who is in the pocket of the environmentalists. Even when he lifts the drilling moratorium his administration withholds the necessary licenses to do the drilling. He refuses to built the Canadian pipeline, he is busy shutting down the coal mines which according to his own words will cause the cost of electricity to 'skyrocket'. And where are the feeble Republicans? They have difficulty finding success and when they do find it they don't know how to handle it. They seem to be outsmarted at every turn. They don't kick the can down the road, they end up kicking the country down the road because of their political ineptness.
There's not much to be encouraged about. Their complaint seems to be, 'I'm their leader, which way did they go'. ?
Bob
From: Stephen
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 8:19 AM
To: WALSH, BOBBYGUNTHER
Subject: poll comments
Bobby,
What compromise or backing down? President Obama is just playing shell games. According to the President, the Catholic Church does not have to provide abortion and contraception services, but their health insurance provider does for FREE! Does the President believe Catholics are stupid? Catholic organizations are going to pay those health care provider bills in turn funding these services, resulting in the Church paying for abortion and contraception.
A side note for the many talking heads who don’t seem to get it: the Catholic Church is more than a physical structure or a mass that occurs within that building, but it is all the people, organizations, schools, hospitals and such that comprise the Catholic Church.
And where’s Bob Casey? He’s invisible on this Constitutional issue. He was out front back when the President signed this into law.
Steve
Nazareth, PA
From: Mike
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 6:58 AM
To: WALSH, BOBBYGUNTHER
Subject: Obama's compromise & Government health care
Gunther –
The controversy that is occurring right now goes beyond the contraceptive issue with the Catholic Church and even beyond this President.
This is what happens when government is involved in health care.
These types of decisions – such as to who is covered, what procedures are covered, and who is forced to pay for certain services – will be constantly coming up and being decided by President Obama or Presidents of the future.
It is exactly why it is so important that President Obama is defeated in November, and that the next President – and Congress – is totally committed to repealing ObamaCare.
Mike
From: Carl
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 9:41 AM
To: WALSH, BOBBYGUNTHER
Subject: How to criticize Obama
Hi, Bobby -
Although I did not vote for him, I had great hopes that Barack Obama could do wonders in our country by putting to rest the constant and overblown allegations of racisim in our society. After all, he is HALF black and HALF white. After all, he was elected to our nation's highest office by a population that is mostly Caucasian. Nevertheless, he has totally portrayed himself as black and black only,and continued to polarize our country along racial lines.
So, when criticizing his policies, anyone who wants to avoid being anti-black can play a sort of reverse race card, and claim only to be criticizing the half of him that is white, thereby reminding everyone about his true racial heritage, and, at the same time, avoiding being called a bigot. I do wish that we would judge him (or anyone else, for that matter) on the content of his character rather than the color of his skin, but since the media is dead-set against fulfilling Dr. King's dream, perhaps we could just continue to remind everyone that Obama is neither fish nor fowl.
I am so very deeply disappointed in our president because of this racial issue. He doesn't need to claim that he is black, but he does so in order to insulate himself from criticism. If he were honest, he would own his ENTIRE ancestry, not just the half that he has used to divide us far more than the great Dr. Martin Luther King could have imagined. Dr. King looked to the day when we could all label ourselves as Americans, without regard to who our parents were. I am old enough to remember the broadcast of his famous speech in Washington, and remember how his words were the words of a great statesman, who spoke the truth with clarity and courage.
Sincerely yours,
Carl
From: Angela
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 8:10 AM
To: WALSH, BOBBYGUNTHER
Subject: The Secular Media vs. Religious Liberty | CNSnews.com
OBAMA WAGES WAS ON CHRISTIANITY BUT SOMEHOW TO THE NETWORKS THIS IS NOT NEWSWORTHY?
MEANWHILE THIS REVS UP HIS BASE AND -HE HOPES- DIVIDES THE REST OF US AND KEEPS OUR MINDS OFF
OTHER THINGS LIKE WHAT'S HAPPENING IN THE ECONOMY AND THE REST OF THE WORLD. REMEMBER THIS
ADMINISTRATION RUNS ON CRISIS, TURMOIL AND DISTRACTION - WHEN THERE IS NONE THEY CREATE IT.(THE OLD ALINSKY COMMUNITY ORGANIZING MODEL)
From: Angela
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 7:17 AM
To: WALSH, BOBBYGUNTHER
Subject: WE'RE JUST THE BIRTH CONTROL KOOKS
DEAR GUNTHER, WE KNOW THE PROGRESSIVES PLAN AHEAD, GET TOGETHER - MEET AT GATHERINGS, EMAILS, ETC. IT WAS NO MORE EVIDENT - WHAT WAS COMING WHEN THE MODERATOR OF A REPUBLICAN DEBATE KEPT PRESSING THE BIRTH CONTROL ISSUE TO ROMNEY - TRYING TO MAKE ANYONE WHO WOULD
OPPOSE ANY FORM OF BIRTH CONTROL LOOK LIKE A KOOK. THE ADMINISTRATION IS BETTING THE CHURCH WILL EVENTUALLY LOOSE ON THIS ISSUE SINCE SO MANY CATHOLICS USE BIRTH CONTROL. THEY THINK MOST PEOPLE WON'T UNDERSTAND THE REAL ISSUE OF THE STATE CONTROL OF RELIGION AND PEOPLE WILL GIVE UP MORE RIGHTS FOR WHAT THEY PERCEIVE AS FREE OR CHEAPER HEALTH CARE. AT THE SAME TIME THE TALK IS OFF THE ECONOMY - AFTER A WHILE OBAMA CAN MAKE IT LOOK LIKE HE IS THE BENEVOLENT LEADER - COMPROMISE A LITTLE ON THE ISSUE - ACCUSE THE CHURCH AND CONSERVATIVES OF BEING EXTREME AND OUT OF TOUCH. I KEEP WONDERING ABOUT ALL THE SURPRISES OUR GREAT LEADER HAS IN STORE FOR US BEFORE NOVEMBER.
ANGELA, ALLENTOWN
From: Dwight
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 5:51 PM
To: WALSH, BOBBYGUNTHER
Subject: health care
A little irony. When President Clinton had sex in the White House with an intern, the left proclaimed that what happens in the President's bedroom is none of our business. But when our current President wants to mandate contraception insurance, what happents in my bedroom is the President's business.
Dwight
Bethlehem
From: Darryl
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 12:01 PM
To: WALSH, BOBBYGUNTHER
Subject: Stephonofilis debate questions on birth control now make sense!
Remember the repeated questions that made no sense on eliminating birth control that made no sense in the Republican debate. Everyone said "no one is talking about these issues???!"
Well now they are!
At the risk of sounding like the Black Helicopters are coming...... This now looks like a preemptive attempt to get anti choice (Democratic translation-anti women) sound bite on record to use now.
I know it is a stretch to say there is collusion between the MSM and this White House.
-Cheryl
Fogelsville
From: Mike
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 8:25 AM
To: WALSH, BOBBYGUNTHER
Subject: Government forcing churches to fund abortion and contraception services
Gunther –
I heard you talking about the federal government forcing churches to fund abortion and contraception services even though doing so might violate a church’s beliefs and teachings.
That’s the beautiful thing about the Left: they’re tolerant of any viewpoint – as long as it agrees with their own.
Mike
From: Pete
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 2:40 PM
To: Rita Crain; Diane Brundage; joyce; Gavitt.Joshua; Filkins, Jay - DIA; Lewis, John; Gary; Hogan, Tom; Sneddon.Peter; Steve Crain; WALSH, BOBBYGUNTHER
Subject: Unemployment
Please explain –
Today’s unemployment #’s said we added 233,000 jobs for January. In December we had according to gov’t records 132,900,000 people working – in January we had 130,400,000 people working or 2.5 million less people working in January. Of this # they say 1.2 million people just either gave up or took themselves out of the employment market. Still 1.3 million people less even if you disregard this. Yet the govt says we added jobs and the rate went down to 8.3 % - seasonal adjustment is what they claim – but how do they do this??
Only in govt can you lose over a million jobs and still lower the unemployment rate and claim jobs were gained – I hope more people become aware of this farce they perpetrating on the American people.
Thanks Pete
From: James
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 8:30 AM
To: WALSH, BOBBYGUNTHER
Subject: Einstein & Global Warming
Gunther:
In the discussion of global warming zealots I am reminded of the following quote of Albert Einstein -
"No amount of experimentation can prove I'm right. A single experiment could prove I'm wrong."
Why do the warmers think they are in sole possession of the truth, and if they are indeed correct, why do they try so hard to stifle any dissent?
Jim
Allentown
